PS3GL vs. FifaExpert

[marin767]

"Now, I could write a mean and truthful comment to that overview, but I'm going to stay"

you couldnt write anything mean thats truthful.
basically ur players together have no chemistry, hence the reason u had to hoof n pace abuse wings. teams with chemistry can pass round the pitch as a team. 

Firstly, the plan was the international teams to be the 3rd game of 3, so we prepared a kind of a mixed team that has never played together.

We were 6 against 5, hence also that, where it was supposed to be 6v6. It's much easier to put on a passing play if u have fewer controlled players, but we didn't say a word about it.

Now, you disrespectfully say "hoof n pace abuse wings". I call it proper counter attacking football, and we are just waiting on our match to be put on youtube.
 
And bravo on your chemistry, real nice play, lots of passes involved, but except one hit on a goal post in first half, and some nice passing which we covered by returning Balotelli and El Shaarawy deep - nothing too much. U make it sound like we were on a ropes 90 minutes long while you guys puked rainbows with your majestic play.

I remember it differently, and what is more important - the final result proves my point -we adjusted, we played it smart, and we won. If you want, you still have 2 matches to prove us wrong. Would love to get a response from Mr.C and Anky about setting them up!

[Anky]

Not sure why you still have to go on about it...

Less players doesn't always mean better as shown in the game when it was 6v4, you hoofed it up to your players all ready for the counter attack then when it was our turn to attack your players were on our CPU players because they are static, I don't think you hoofed it up every time but you did a hell of a lot. If we had actual players in those positions, if we actually had 6 players or even 5 don't think you think there would've been a lot more movement not just standing there next to your players? A team of 7 or 11 players that know how to play football are going to dominate a 5 or 9 man team because of movement.

Final result doesn't prove anything other than you finished your chance which I've stated. You did not play smart or I suppose Stoke play smart football too but you did win or do you mean being smart when you went into the corner with Balotelli?

You guys take this game far too seriously its laughable to be honest. You do whatever it takes to win, good for you. GG WP 

TLR XI > FeX Fap Team

[marin767]

Not sure why you still have to go on about it...

Less players doesn't always mean better as shown in the game when it was 6v4, you hoofed it up to your players all ready for the counter attack then when it was our turn to attack your players were on our CPU players because they are static, I don't think you hoofed it up every time but you did a hell of a lot. If we had actual players in those positions, if we actually had 6 players or even 5 don't think you think there would've been a lot more movement not just standing there next to your players? A team of 7 or 11 players that know how to play football are going to dominate a 5 or 9 man team because of movement.

I totally disagree - that is valid in real football, in FIFA, there are too many parameters that aren't up to the players. We also had CPU players who you passed through, remember, that is one of the main reasons you could maintain your passing play All I am saying is that 5 players who play together all the time sure have better chemistry than 6 players who never played before in that positions.

Final result doesn't prove anything other than you finished your chance which I've stated. You did not play smart or I suppose Stoke play smart football too but you did win or do you mean being smart when you went into the corner with Balotelli?

What was I supposed to do? Cross on Giovinco or El Shaarawy? C'mon We played it smart - and I love Stoke football btw. Thorn in a side of all major teams in BPL. Opinions are like...

You guys take this game far too seriously its laughable to be honest. You do whatever it takes to win, good for you. GG WP 

Easy to say when you are 5 points behind - blame it on our Machiavelli style, yes, that's our sole advantage, sure.

TLR XI > FeX Fap Team

I do not know what TLR XI is, and I am sure we will never do an event like this again. Sore losers - not appreciated.

[teddyuk]

I will be removing this thread if this persists.

I do think this whole event was disappointing in terms of organisation and was dragged out a little, it's a shame that personal differences seemed to have spoiled this but I would not say that we are bad losers and it's just a case of disagreements.

Keep things respectful guys

[nalaboy]

I know I haven't been involved (yet) but you lost me as having a valid point when you said you admired Stoke   I have a good feeling about our 6v6 as there some good players in there..... and me )

[Anky]

Not sure why you still have to go on about it...

Less players doesn't always mean better as shown in the game when it was 6v4, you hoofed it up to your players all ready for the counter attack then when it was our turn to attack your players were on our CPU players because they are static, I don't think you hoofed it up every time but you did a hell of a lot. If we had actual players in those positions, if we actually had 6 players or even 5 don't think you think there would've been a lot more movement not just standing there next to your players? A team of 7 or 11 players that know how to play football are going to dominate a 5 or 9 man team because of movement.

I totally disagree - that is valid in real football, in FIFA, there are too many parameters that aren't up to the players. We also had CPU players who you passed through, remember, that is one of the main reasons you could maintain your passing play All I am saying is that 5 players who play together all the time sure have better chemistry than 6 players who never played before in that positions.

Final result doesn't prove anything other than you finished your chance which I've stated. You did not play smart or I suppose Stoke play smart football too but you did win or do you mean being smart when you went into the corner with Balotelli?

What was I supposed to do? Cross on Giovinco or El Shaarawy? C'mon We played it smart - and I love Stoke football btw. Thorn in a side of all major teams in BPL. Opinions are like...

You guys take this game far too seriously its laughable to be honest. You do whatever it takes to win, good for you. GG WP 

Easy to say when you are 5 points behind - blame it on our Machiavelli style, yes, that's our sole advantage, sure.

TLR XI > FeX Fap Team

I do not know what TLR XI is, and I am sure we will never do an event like this again. Sore losers - not appreciated.

Why are you still going on about it?

Like I said, it works both ways when it comes down to numbers. An 11 man team that know how to play football would whoop a 9 man team on equal level because its down to movement for the team. We had 4 players, the ANY has never played with us 3 before so what are you on about?

You didn't play smart at all, kicking it up and hoping someone is on the end of it? You can see when your ANY when tries to hoof it up but it ends up out of play too.

You do take this game way too seriously, its nothing to do with us losing; for you to even suggest this is silly to be honest and pretty much proves it. I credited the fact you got the job done but your arrogance likes to keep going on and on. This event has been a total joke; you consider your team to be golden children, never in the wrong but you're quick to jump to conclusions on our side aren't you?

[teddyuk]

I have locked this thread for all purposes.

It's a learning curve in my eyes and it's important that future matches against other sites are done on a set day so future events doesn't drag on like this.

[Hilton-91]

I do not know what TLR XI is, and I am sure we will never do an event like this again. Sore losers - not appreciated.